The wild frontier of animal welfare Earth Day 2021: Restore Our Earth Soil degradation: the problems and how to fix them How We Can Put a Halt to Biodiversity Loss Rhino numbers recover, but new threats emerge Govt afforests over 25,000 hectares of land in nearly three years How to stop discarded face masks from polluting the planet How plastics contribute to climate change Unplanned industrialisation killing the Sutang river ‘Covid-19 medical waste disposal neglected’

Glitter could be bad for environment


Most glitters are in essence teeny tiny bits of shiny plastic, called microplastics. They are a well-known environmental hazard for the world's oceans, and they're currently a hot topic in the United Kingdom. The UK next year will implement a ban on microbeads — a type of microplastic found in face washes, body scrubs and other products. (The US already has a partial ban on microbeads in place.)This impending ban prompted some scientists to tell The Independent that glitters — like loose glitter and those found in makeup and body products — should be considered a similar hazard, the CNN report says.Microplastics can pollute marine environments, leech chemicals into the water and pose harm to marine life if they are ingested.Dr Trisia Farrelly, an environmental anthropologist at Massey University in New Zealand, told The Independent "all glitter should be banned."Luckily, there is hope for those of us who still choose to punish ourselves for a glittery fix: Some companies make environmentally friendly alternatives that are biodegradable and don't clog up waterways.

Read more: http://www.thedailystar.net/environment/glitter-could-be-bad-environment-1498570

Posted by on Jan 16 2018. Filed under Environmental Justice & Governance, No Toxic. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply to Anonymous

Hellod

sd544

Polls

Which Country is most Beautifull?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...