California is managing its forests — but is the president managing its federal lands? Termites mitigate effects of drought in tropical rainforests Palamu Tiger Reserve land diverted without ministry permission Farmers waste 800 litres of water to grow a kg of paddy Food Front: Not That Rosy at All Australia could hit 100% renewables sooner than most people think The lifesaving food 90% aren’t eating enough of High-fiber diet linked to lower risk of death and chronic diseases Can Bangladesh meet its 10% renewable energy target by 2020? Clean and Green Bangladesh: A goal that can be achieved

The global food problem isn’t what you think


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Providing food security to the nearly 10 billion people who will inhabit the globe by 2050 is one of the key issues of the 21st century. Given that reality, you might think the international community would at least be able to agree on how to define the problem. Unfortunately, you would be wrong.While a large part of the agricultural research establishment is focused on one aspect of the challenge — calories — another part of the scientific community is focused on a related but different one: adequate nutrient consumption.

To this point, the first group has driven the world’s agricultural research agenda. But a new study I co-authored with a group of international scientists and recently published in Nature Sustainability suggests that calorie fundamentalism is leading us down a dangerous path. Our group looked at both the question of how much food will be available during the next three decades and the question of whether this food will meet our nutritional needs.

With a depth and breadth that goes far beyond previous studies, we made assessments for 158 different countries of the current supply of macronutrients, such as carbohydrates, protein and fat, and micronutrients, such as vitamins and minerals needed for good health, cognition and productivity. We then forecast the country-by-country needs in 2050, when the global population will have increased by about 2.1 billion and when the economies of these countries will likely have expanded. Finally, to provide both best- and worst-case scenarios, we projected a future without climate change and one with extreme climate change.

For More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/01/02/global-food-problem-isnt-what-you-think/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bd9786c83860

Posted by on Jan 7 2019. Filed under Food security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

Polls

Which Country is most Beautifull?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...